![should i update to lightroom 6.12 should i update to lightroom 6.12](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/5c/4e/ef/5c4eef0378649da611142fc8b50b2454.png)
- Should i update to lightroom 6.12 archive#
- Should i update to lightroom 6.12 trial#
- Should i update to lightroom 6.12 plus#
That's how I look at it (but regularly try other products just to keep up to date with possible alternatives and technology in general). If I were to buy and update tools from different vendors to obtain similar functionality, I would have to spend more money and work harder integrating those products.
Should i update to lightroom 6.12 plus#
Plus the roughly 25 years worth of personal experience working with Photoshop! I also get phone apps that work pretty nicely, a humongous amount of tutorials and techniques and a few other goodies. In exchange, I have access to the most complete combo of DAM/Development/Retouching in the world. I pay $140 every 2 years to keep Photoshop up to date and $100 for Lightroom. I "bought" Photoshop for $80 and Lightroom for $40. In my experience, nothing comes close to the value offered by the Adobe subscription. This is not fully responsive to your question, as I can't claim to be thoroughly immersed in ACDSee, but if you check the post and the thread which is its context, you might find something useful.Īlso, my comments apply to ACDSee Ultimate 10, which may not be what you are looking at. Here's a post I did last week over in the Fuji forum in response to a similar question: Once the images are tagged, later on it's not too difficult choose a another DAM that might be available in the future which can scan the files and build a new database to work with. XMP sidecar files created by the DAM also increase performance as you are organizing tags. Having a good database that allows quick sorting for images based on file information and other tags is crucial. Other good alternatives for DAMs are imatch and photo supreme. Daminion is focusing more on their high end team business although they still sell and support their home versions here: . After trying several I decided on Daminion, which has done the job for me. To tackle this challenge I decided to replace Lightroom with a DAM that would make the job easier without depending on a subscription forever.
![should i update to lightroom 6.12 should i update to lightroom 6.12](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51NeZqAi-2L._SY200_.jpg)
When tagging is completed it's on to trays of slides, folders of negatives and boxes of prints to sort and scan. I started with tagging files a few years ago in Lightroom, but this is only about half completed. Keywords and other tags are critical if I want to find images in this large collection. I spent several weeks getting 38000 images into a maintainable file structure.
![should i update to lightroom 6.12 should i update to lightroom 6.12](https://www.thephoblographer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Lightroom_TargetAdjustmentTool-770x549.jpg)
Should i update to lightroom 6.12 archive#
I finally decided to take on the enormous job of putting the whole archive into a consistent logical organization. For many years I've added on to it using Lightroom. Since 2000 when my digital archive began I've built onto different file structures leaving the files in various states of organization. I just saw that ACDSee is having a sale for 80 bucks to get the ultimate 10 version. With that said I am trying to save me some money and i currently pay 10 dollars a month for the photography pack on CC. I can count on one hand how many times ive used photoshop to work on a photo.
Should i update to lightroom 6.12 trial#
If you trial ACDSee and find it works well enough then why not. The Develop panel is what separates LR/ACR from everybody else imo. I know some settings to get by and play with the develop a lot till i get what i like. I am fairly happy with lightroom, however i really dont use most of the capabilities of it. I have buried myself in so many photos that i will need to spend some honest work in trying to get them reorganized. Is there something better than the above mentioned that i am overlooking? Looking for something that is easy to use, and I can organize my photos properly. I have done prints in the past but they are few and far between. I do have my own site, that i like to post my favorites to as well. Would i be happy with ACDSee? 90% of my photos are either viewed here or on Flickr.